Peters Accuses BSA of Censorship in Podcast Regulation Debate

New Zealand’s Foreign Minister, Winston Peters, has launched a strong critique against the Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA), accusing it of resorting to “Soviet era stasi” tactics following its recent decision to regulate podcasts and online media. Peters took to social media to express his outrage, labeling the BSA’s move a “blatant overreach” and demanding an explanation for what he described as a “recent outrageous action.”

Peters questioned why the BSA believes it can create regulations in secret meetings, equating its actions to those of oppressive regimes. He stated, “Why does the Broadcasting Standards Authority think they can make up their own rules in secret meetings to act like some Soviet era stasi?” His comments reflect growing concerns about the implications of increased governmental oversight on free expression in the digital age.

On the same day, the Free Speech Union issued a statement criticizing the BSA’s decision to regulate podcasters, including prominent figures like Sean Plunket. The organization described the BSA’s actions as exceeding its legal mandate.

Context of the BSA’s Regulation Decision

The BSA recently addressed a complaint that alleged “unacceptable racist comments” were made during The Platform’s Live Talkback programme on July 22, 2025. A letter from the BSA published on The Platform’s website outlined its jurisdiction, asserting that the content aired by The Platform qualifies as “broadcasting” under the law. The Broadcasting Act defines “broadcaster” as any entity that transmits programs, which the BSA believes applies to The Platform’s activities.

In response to the initial complaint, The Platform’s management retorted to the complainant, stating, “You Plonker, we aren’t subject to the Broadcasting Standards Authority.” This exchange highlights the tension between digital platforms and regulatory bodies.

The BSA’s letter outlined the process to determine whether The Platform should be defined as a broadcaster. According to the Broadcasting Act, a “programme” includes sounds or visual images intended to inform or entertain, which the BSA argues applies to The Platform’s content.

Concerns Over Free Expression and Regulation

Jillaine Heather, chief executive of the Free Speech Union, voiced serious concerns regarding the BSA’s move. She warned that this could represent a significant threat to free expression in New Zealand. Heather pointed out that Plunket, a veteran journalist and founder of The Platform, operates entirely online and has faced multiple confrontations with regulatory authorities and mainstream media.

“If the BSA is allowed to extend its reach into podcasts and online media, it will be policing speech it was never designed to regulate,” Heather stated. She emphasized that the current situation, focused on Plunket, could set a precedent that risks silencing a broader range of opinions.

Heather also referenced previous instances where the BSA suggested that freedom of expression itself could lead to “harm,” warning that this could lead regulators to act more like censors rather than protectors of open debate.

In light of these developments, the Free Speech Union has called on Parliament to clarify that the BSA holds no authority over podcasts or internet content. They emphasized the need for any future changes to broadcasting law to be openly debated rather than implemented behind closed doors.

The BSA, Peters, and Plunket have been approached for further comments regarding this contentious issue, which continues to raise questions about the balance between regulation and free speech in the digital landscape.