New Strategies Proposed to Revamp Resource Management Act

In August 2016, former finance minister Bill English highlighted the limitations of New Zealand’s urban planning regulations during a discussion about a draft review by the Productivity Commission. English acknowledged the system’s strengths but emphasized its “unresponsive and risk-averse” nature, calling for a fundamental shift in the “planning culture.” This marked the beginning of conversations aimed at overhauling the Resource Management Act (RMA).

The RMA, established to promote sustainable management of natural resources, has faced criticism for its complexity and rigidity. Stakeholders argue that it has hindered timely development and infrastructure projects, which are crucial for accommodating New Zealand’s growing population. English’s remarks underscored the need for new legislation to create a more flexible and proactive regulatory framework.

Challenges with Current Urban Planning Regulations

Urban planners and developers have long pointed out that the existing RMA framework can lead to prolonged approval processes. According to a report from the Productivity Commission, the average time for resource consents has increased significantly, with some projects taking years to gain approval. This delay not only burdens developers but also impacts communities waiting for new housing and amenities.

English noted that a cultural shift is essential for addressing these issues. He proposed that a more permissive planning environment would facilitate quicker decision-making and better reflect the needs of local communities. This approach aims to balance environmental protection with the demand for development, ensuring sustainable growth without stifling progress.

Legislative changes could include streamlined consent processes and clearer guidelines for urban development. By simplifying regulations, the government aims to promote economic growth while maintaining environmental standards.

Next Steps in Reforming the RMA

The government has taken initial steps toward reforming the RMA by seeking public input on proposed changes. In a series of consultations, stakeholders from various sectors, including environmental groups, local councils, and business leaders, are sharing their insights on how to improve the system.

The push for reform aligns with broader government goals to enhance housing supply and infrastructure development. In the face of rising housing costs and increasing demand, officials recognize the urgency of modernizing planning regulations.

As the government moves forward with proposed reforms, the emphasis will be on creating a more adaptable framework that can respond to the evolving needs of New Zealand’s cities and communities. The outcome of these discussions could redefine how urban planning is approached, potentially leading to a more dynamic and efficient system that benefits both developers and residents alike.

In summary, the call for a revised RMA reflects a growing recognition of the need for a more responsive planning culture. With contributions from key stakeholders and a commitment to balancing development with sustainability, New Zealand may be on the path to a more effective regulatory framework that meets the challenges of the future.