Young Australians Speak Out on Social Media Ban Ahead of Deadline

Starting March 2024, the Australian government will enforce a ban on social media access for thousands of young Australians under the age of 16 across ten platforms. This decision, which has sparked significant debate and controversy, aims to protect minors in the digital space. However, the perspectives of young people themselves have often been overlooked in discussions surrounding this ban.

Understanding Young Voices on the Ban

In a recent study conducted by a team of 14 researchers, 86 individuals aged between 12 and 15 from various regions of Australia shared their thoughts on the impending social media ban. Their insights reveal a complex relationship with social media, emphasizing the need for a more nuanced approach to digital interactions.

The legislation to ban social media access for younger users was passed approximately 12 months ago, prompting widespread media attention. Yet, the voices of those most affected—the young users—have not been sufficiently represented in the debate. According to research, including their perspectives is crucial for developing policies that uphold their rights and promote healthy digital engagement.

Many young people feel that adults often frame the conversation around social media in terms of moral panic, depicting them as vulnerable and in need of stringent restrictions. This perspective overlooks the positive aspects of social media, such as learning opportunities and community building. A 13-year-old boy articulated this sentiment, stating, “I think my parents don’t really understand, like they only understand the bad part not the good side to it.”

The Complex Lives of Young Social Media Users

Responses from the participants highlighted the diversity in their social media usage. Some reported minimal use, while others were highly active. Yet, they expressed a common frustration: discussions about the ban fail to recognize their varied experiences. Many participants emphasized that while risks exist, social media also serves as a valuable tool for education and connection.

For instance, a 15-year-old girl noted the supportive role social media plays in her hobbies, explaining how platforms help her learn new skills. Others echoed this sentiment, indicating that social media acts as a lifeline for those seeking community and understanding. One 12-year-old girl shared, “The ability to find new interests and find community with people. This is quite important to me.”

Young users also pointed out that a blanket ban does not address the root issues related to their social media experiences. A 12-year-old boy remarked, “Banning [social media] fully just straight up makes it a lot harder than finding a solution to the problem.”

In their discussions, young people expressed a desire for more effective solutions that do not involve outright bans. They advocated for better content regulation rather than simple age restrictions. A 14-year-old boy suggested, “I think instead of doing like a kids’ version and adult version, there should just be a crackdown on the content, like tighter restrictions and stronger enforcement towards the restrictions.”

Moreover, participants called for enhanced educational programs that focus on media literacy, recognizing the potential benefits of social media. A 15-year-old boy stated, “I’d rather [the government] just like implement more media literacy programs instead of just banning [social media] altogether.”

As the deadline for the social media ban approaches, it is clear that young Australians are not merely passive recipients of policy. Their feedback highlights the importance of incorporating their voices into discussions about digital safety and the future of social media.

Michael Dezuanni, one of the researchers involved in the study, has received funding from the Australian Research Council. Co-researchers Kim Osman and Lynrose Jane Genon have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic roles.